In Pursuit of Equity: The Ongoing Struggle for the Equal Rights AmendmentMain MenuIntroductionERA TimelineBeginnings of the ERABreaking Barriers with The ERABacklash To The Equal Rights AmendmentThe Equal Rights Amendment In The Present DayThe Women of the ERAEinav Rabinovitch-Fox2e56e3d6b4b5f137a53bf7f9d80912f3b70a7958Kintan Silvany27acd809d8b92f60fa0c22b1d284608814bc6757Abner Calderonb03ac0a842793a715372659d5c676baf1603fc74Aly Memberg633115900d9e4fdd285e59fb0d1f7aebe9630776By Abner Calderon, Aly Memberg, Kintan Silvany and Einav Rabinovitch-Fox
12023-05-27T05:52:43+00:00Drafting the ERA3plain2023-05-27T14:35:07+00:00 Plans to create an Equal Rights Amendment began in May 1921, and its first introduction into a session of Congress would come in December 1923. In between, a contentious back-and-forth dialogue unfolded as the NWP attempted to negotiate with various legal advisors and potential allies. At first, Alice Paul (who was leading the writing process) sought help from the leaders of multiple prominent political organizations, such as the National Consumers’ League (NCL) and the League of Women Voters (LWV). These important figures were mostly protectionists, many of them having been personally involved in crafting special protective labor laws for women, and as such they voiced concerns that an ERA would lead to legal challenges to those protections. Paul was receptive to this feedback, and over the course of the spring and summer of 1921, every draft revision included a “saving clause” at the end, which exempted certain categories of sex-specific legislation from the preceding obligation of equal rights. However, no consensus could be reached on how to word this clause without entirely defanging the amendment, and as progress stalled, Paul increasingly came to see the protective laws as more harm than good, because they ultimately justified gender inequality and thus legal deprivations as well. At a party meeting that November, the NWP decided to continue drafting the amendment without the saving clause. The protectionists quickly coordinated their opposition to the still-developing ERA, and as a result, the first decade of the ERA’s life in Congress consisted of six committee hearings that overwhelmingly favored the opposition, and no further progress was made on that front.